Malcolm Cadman
47 Marlowe House
Bowditch
Deptford
London SE8


24th May 2004 Ref : London Borough of Lewisham - CPO 2004 - Pepys Estate



Dear Deputy Prime Minister and First Secretary of State,


I object to the Compulsory Purchase Order - London Borough of Lewisham ( Pepys Estate, Deptford ) CPO 2004.

I ask that a Public Enquiry be held to fairly consider my objection.

I have been a Secure Council Tenant, Leaseholder, at the property - 47 Marlowe House - for over 27 years.

The latter 25 of those years as the Secure Tenant.

I have a Right to Buy application in progress with London Borough of Lewisham, Active Date of 11th February 2003.

The landlord - London Borough of Lewisham - are concurrently Seeking an Order for Possession my property at the Woolwich County Court, served 23rd December 2003, under Ground 10A of the 1985 Housing Act, for which I have filed a Defence and Counter-Claim to complete my Right to Buy.

As a key worker - a teacher working for the London Borough of Greenwich - I value the property very highly, as it has and continues to provide a secure home at a reasonable cost in London. Enabling me to practise use my skills and talents for the benefit of people in London.

My property is a 3-bed maisonette flat in a block of 53 flats, which is Marlowe House. It features spacious room layout together with well-lit rooms by daylight, and open views to parks and the nearby river Thames. It has good size balconies at front and rear. It has security by entry phone at main front and flat level entry. It has central heating. It is provided with a lift. I am content to live in the property.

The property will meet the minimum level of the Governments' Decent Homes Standard, even though it has not received the full renovation works that have already been undertaken to 8 identical blocks of flats on the Pepys estate under Pepys Estate Action 1992-2001 - the corresponding properties are :

Argosy House, Bembridge House, Bence House, Clement House,
Harmon House, Landyard House, Pelican House and Pendennis House.

Taken altogether as 10 identical blocks of 53 flats these properties compromise a design feature termed the "London Wall", as they curve through the Estate from the riverside to Evelyn Street, SE8.

All of these properties have gardens for the flats at ground level, and garages at the rear of the ground floor.

The principal architect for the scheme was Ted Hollandby, GLC, who himself resided at the Red House built by William Morris in Bexley, South London.

Marlowe House and Millard House were included at a late stage in a diversion from the Estate Action by a revised Form B. At that time 1997/98 £6m of funding remained of the Estate Action budget, enough to complete the scheduled works. Which had been awaited since 1992. Marlowe House and Millard House being scheduled at the end of the scheme for the required works in 1998/99.

Harmon House and Pelican House were the last of the identical blocks of 53 flats to be refurbished under Estate Action - those being completed in 2000; and they, together with other parts of the estate benefited from further works when the diversion was made, using the £6m of funding.

Albemarle House - 16 flats - was the last property to be refurbished in 2001 under Estate Action.
The redevelopment scheme by Hyde Housing Association has been split into 3 Phases :

Phase 1 - Demolition of Barfleur House, 32 flats, and Dolben Court, 52 flats, they each had dis-used underground car parks from there original purpose. Yet the Dolben Court area was in good use by many local community arts groups.
An Enterprise Centre with European Social Fund has refurbished a part of this, to good effect.
Dolben Court had received Estate Action works including double-glazing. This spend was then wasted by demolition of these 2 blocks in 2001.

Phase 2 - Limberg House had none of the so called "problems" with underground garages or walkways, that Barfleur and Dolben Court were alleged to have. It could easily have been refurbished "stand alone". Again Limberg House had received Estate Action works including double-glazing. This spend was then wasted by demolition in 2003.

Phase 3 - Proposed demolition of Marlowe House and Millard House.
Why ? As 8 identical blocks of 53 flat properties have been refurbished ( see earlier list ).
The properties are structurally sound.
Restorative works to the properties would cost around 1/5th of the proposed demolition and re-build.
More "social housing" in the Borough will be lost. "Affordable" housing is not a replacement for "social housing".

The redevelopment scheme should be halted, now, at the commencement of Phase 2, and proceed no further.

Marlowe House and Millard house should be refurbished under the Decent Homes Standard.

Which has recently commenced in late 2003 on the older properties of Trinity Estate, nearby.

Marlowe House and Millard House have awaited works since the beginning of Estate Action in 1992, they can wait a little longer for other funding to preserve them, and renovate them.

The redevelopment scheme as a whole put to then Secretary of State also included Aragon Tower - a 24 storey tower block. This has been sold, separately to the private market. Losing 144 "social housing" units, and producing a very large Capital receipt of around £12m.

The London Borough of Lewisham have perverted the Communities Plan for "mixed communities" into a scheme where an established community has been broken up, "social housing" removed, secure tenancies taken away for less generous assured tenancies, shared ownership introduced at a cost above local affordability, and the private housing market made a beneficiary of a prime asset.

A Public Inquiry is called for.



Yours sincerely,



Malcolm Cadman